Practical Technology

for practical people.

August 24, 2007
by sjvn01
0 comments

Microsoft kills off anti-Linux ‘Get the Facts’ site

In Linux circles, Microsoft’s anti-Linux site, Get the Facts, was better known as Get the FUD, and was seen as more of a joke than a convincing argument in favor of Microsoft products over Linux. Microsoft may have come to agree that the site was not serving any useful purpose, as the company closed it down on Aug. 23.

From the beginning of the “Get the Facts” ad campaign in 2004, Microsoft’s “Facts” were often questioned. Reports favoring Microsoft’s TCO (total cost of ownership) from research groups like the Yankee Group were published. When the Yankee Group published a report showing that Linux and Windows were neck and neck in TCO, Microsoft didn’t tell the world about the pro-Linux report.

Even at the start, Microsoft took other reports and published them out of context. For example, the first report Microsoft published was a 2002 vintage IDC report, which was sponsored by Microsoft, comparing TCO of Windows 2000 to Linux. IDC found that W2K beat out Linux in four out of five common enterprise tasks. This may have been true in 2002, but in 2004? I don’t think so. By then there were lots of Linux network-smart administrators.

I could go on and on–for example, about Microsoft trying to hide that it was sponsoring anti-Linux research–but there’s little point.

Now, though, Microsoft is of at least three minds about Linux. One, represented by Steve Ballmer and his patent lawsuit fantasies, still wants to stomp Linux and open source into the ground. Then there’s the side that wants to give Linux and open source lip service while doing as little as possible. Here, I count Microsoft’s open-source projects and its recent efforts to get its own open-source licenses.

Then, there’s the part of Microsoft that gets that Microsoft is going to have to learn to live with Linux. Mind you, it really doesn’t want to, but Linux isn’t going away. In this group, I count the people who came up with the technology interchange with Novell and the people who are still, I’m certain, trying to work out a similar agreement with Red Hat for Red Hat Global Desktop.

The new replacement for the Get the Facts site, the Windows Server “Compare” site, isn’t as bad as the old one. Still, at the end of the day, it’s just a propaganda site masquerading as objective information.

No surprise, really. I mean, Microsoft and FUD go together like stink and… Ahem. Anyway, if you want the real facts about Windows Server 2003 versus Red Hat Enterprise Linux, why not try Linux out yourself? After all, business server Linuxes are never more than a download away.

My recommendations for a business Linux server are RHEL 5, SLES (SUSE Linux Enterprise Server) 10 Service Pack 1 , and the RHEL clones, Oracle’s Unbreakable Linux and CentOS for experienced Linux users.

A version of this story was first published on Linux-Watch.

August 17, 2007
by sjvn01
0 comments

How many Linux desktop users are there?

Desktop operating systems numbers, even when gathered by top research companies, such as IDG and Gartner, are often a bit fuzzy. When it comes to uncommon desktop operating systems, like Linux, the numbers often amount to little more than an educated guess. Now, a new open-source program, statix, promises to give accurate data on how many Linux desktops are actually in use.

Cole Crawford, a Dell Linux IT strategist, created statix to anonymously track the number of Linux desktops worldwide via an opt in Python script. Crawford is a long-time Linux user and has been involved in the Linux community since the launch of Slackware 1.0 in 1993.

Statix uses a Python client and a hosted Python CGI (Common Gateway Interface) back end to track the country in which each desktop is running. Eventually it will also be able to track the kernel and distribution of statix-using Linux desktops. The project is currently seeking a MySQL database administrator and a user interface UI developer.

While Crawford is a Dell employee, this is a purely open-source project. In a brief conversation at LinuxWorld in early August in San Francisco, Crawford said, “This is my attempt to give something back to the Linux community, which has helped me so much over the years.”

This project has Linux Foundation’s support. As John Cherry, the Foundation’s global initiative manager, explained, “We have been playing with market data for years now, and with freely distributable software, it is very difficult to glean this market data.”

Linux desktop surveys such as DesktopLinux’s own annual survey tend to be biased towards Linuxes with large, active communities, which encourage their supporters to vote. Other popularly quoted numbers, such as those from DistroWatch Page Hit Ranking, tend to reflect the interests of community-supported Linuxes and quickly evolving Linux distributions. So, for example, Mint, which has released several different editions in the last eight months, gets far more attention than the comparatively slow changing Red Hat distributions.

To make statix more accurate than these sites, or the results from the interviews of CIOs and CTOs that the research companies use, Cherry wants all the Linux distributions to adopt statix and help with its development. “The trick,” according to Cherry, “will be to get this deployed in all of the open and commercial Linux distributions. If it doesn’t get fully deployed, we will have yet another skewed source of desktop Linux market data.”

So it is that Cherry asks that, “If desktop Linux market data is important to you or your company, please become involved in the statix project and in the deployment of this tool on every distro. I realize that market data can be a double-edged sword, so distro vendors should get those issues on the table early.”

A version of this story first appeared in Desktop Linux.

August 15, 2007
by sjvn01
0 comments

VMware to Face Citrix/XenSource Challenge

Citrix buying XenSource is the best thing that could happen to the company behind the popular open-source virtualization program Xen, and it’s the worst thing that could happen to VMware.

It seems like only yesterday that I was saying VMwares IPO made no sense to me. Oh, wait, it was just yesterday.

One of the big reasons for my dismissal of VMwares business chances was that I looked at all the open-source alternatives to VMwares flagship programs—Xen, OpenVZ, KVM, VirtualBox and UML (User Mode Linux)—and I didnt see a long, happy future for VMwares proprietary offering.

I also took into account the fact that the same Linux companies that have buried the x86 Unix companies—Red Hat and Novell/SUSE at the top of the list—were the same ones that were pushing Xen forward. If I had had the space to go into a long-winded discussion of VMwares open-source rivals, I would have mentioned one problem with them. From where I sit, only OpenVZ, which is backed by SWsoft, has shown a lot in the way of business smarts.

Its a truism thats all too true. Great technologies are made by great technologists, who far more often than not are not great business people. XenSource, maker of Xen, the most popular open-source program, was, alas, no different from the rest.

Now, however, for what I think will prove to be a cheap $500 million, XenSource has been picked up by Citrix. Citrix, for those of you who dont know it, has made a living for ages by providing Windows desktops and applications to remote users with first MetaFrame and now Presentation Server.

So what, you ask? You know, Ive been in the technology journalism business for over 20 years and one of the other truisms of the business is that nobody, and I mean nobody, partners with Microsoft and wins in the long run. There is, however, an exception to that rule. That exception is Citrix.

Any company that has managed for over a decade to not only survive within Microsofts shadow, but to profit from it, clearly knows how to run a business. Citrix also knows virtualization. Its new Application Virtualization Suite 3.0 is all about running virtualized applications in a way that makes it easy for both users and administrators.

So, here we are. On one side you have Xen. You can argue that its not only the most well-known open-source virtualization program, but technically the best. On the other, you have a company that knows how to thrive while competing with that great white shark of software, Microsoft. Put them together, and you not only have a great future for open-source virtualization, but a company that can give VMware all the competition it can handle and more.

A version of this story first appeared in eWEEK.

August 11, 2007
by sjvn01
0 comments

SCO’s KIA, but what about the rest of the troopers?

When Judge Kimball ruled against SCO in favor of Novel and said that Novell owned Unix’s IP (intellectual property), that was the end of SCO. So now, SCO’s legal cases are dead — but what about its friends and partners?

I’ve said since the beginning that there was next to nothing to SCO’s claims that Unix IP had illegally been transferred into Unix. After all, SCO itself had incorporated Linux code into Unix. I thought the APA (Asset Purchase Agreement), which gave SCO the right to sell Unix but didn’t give the company the IP rights to Unix, would prove SCO’s case’s Achilles’ heel.

I presume SCO will appeal. Much good it will do them. SCO may still thrash a bit, like a snake with a broken back, but it’s dead and done.

I always knew the APA would end up killing SCO. SCO never really had much of a case in its Linux IP court actions, but it did have the merest smidgen of claims — albeit no real evidence — needed to make an IP case. The APA case, however, was simple contract law. And, SCO was on the wrong side of the contract.

So what happens now? First, SCO really is vulture bait. The company’s been trying to start up a mobile middleware business, but that’s doing no great shakes and the company’s core Unix business has continued downhill.

The court also decided that SCO owes Novell at least some of the money it made from its Sun and Microsoft licensing deals. That should wipe out SCO’s cash reserves nicely.

With Novell now firmly in charge of SCO’s, excuse me, Novell’s Unix and UnixWare IP, SCO’s Unix business is now road kill. The only real question I have at this point is, “When will SCO’s bankruptcy proceedings start?”

SCO’s Unix reseller partners should now run, not walk, to become Linux resellers. If you’re stuck with supporting SCO UnixWare and OpenServer, it would be wise to visit Novell PartnerNet, say by the next business day, and start talking partnership.

Then, there’s Sun. At one time, Sun was an SCO supporter. That was back in the day when Sun was in one of its “We hate Linux” phases. Sun’s Jonathan Schwartz — then Sun VP of software and today Sun’s president and CEO — said in 2003 that Sun had bought “rights equivalent to ownership” to Unix.

SCO agreed. In 2005, SCO CEO Darl McBride said that SCO had no problem with Sun open-sourcing Unix code in what would become OpenSolaris. “We have seen what Sun plans to do with OpenSolaris and we have no problem with it,” McBride said. “What they’re doing protects our Unix intellectual property rights.”

Sun now has a little problem, which might become a giant one: SCO never had any Unix IP to sell. Therefore, it seems likely that Solaris and OpenSolaris contains Novell’s Unix IP. Whoops! Mr. Schwartz, I’d suggest calling Novell CEO Ron Hovsepian real soon now. Oh, and Mr. Schwartz, when I saw Hovsepian last Wednesday night, I believe he said he was going home for the weekend. Under the circumstances, I’m sure he wouldn’t mind you calling him at home.

Microsoft, of course, has also helped SCO out. The Windows giant bought a Unix license it almost certainly didn’t need and Microsoft executives convinced BayStar Capital to waste — or was that invest? — $50 million on SCO. That deal eventually blew up in everyone’s face, but SCO got some much-needed capital.

Since Microsoft and Novell are on good terms at the moment, Microsoft appears to have gotten away clean. On the other hand, I wonder whether, when Microsoft and Novell partnered up in November, the company already realized that Microsoft was the one that needed IP protection from Novell.

Oh, and Microsoft, given SCO’s example with what happens to companies that start court cases on the foggiest of IP claims, I’d shut up now about your even more vague patent claims. Consider this a word to the wise.

Finally, there are SCO’s stock owners. What can I say except, “You poor dumb jerks.” It’s over.

A version of this story first appeared in Linux-Watch.

August 10, 2007
by sjvn01
6 Comments

SCO Goes Down in Flames: Novell owns Unix

The day Linux fans have been waiting for since SCO attacked Linux on May 12, 2003 has finally arrived. U.S. District Court Judge Dale Kimball has ruled that Novell, not SCO, owns Unix’s IP (intellectual property) rights. This, in turn, means the end of SCO’s cases against IBM.

In his 102-page decision, Kimball went on to rule that “SCO is obligated to recognize Novell’s waiver of SCO’s claims against IBM and Sequent” [story], Thus, not only does Novell own Unix, SCO’s cases against IBM have essentially been destroyed.

Continue Reading →

August 10, 2007
by sjvn01
0 comments

Linspire executives exodus?

According to multiple sources close to Linux distributor Linspire, former CEO Kevin Carmony was not the only executive to leave Linspire at the end of July. Sources say that Chad Olson, the company’s CFO, and other high-ranking officials including the comptroller and the head of the Linux engineering team had also left by July 31.

We have made numerous attempts in the last week to get either a formal confirmation or a denial of these rumored executive changes from Linspire and its founder and primary owner, Michael Robertson, without success. The new Linspire CEO and president, Larry Kettler, had no comment on these rumors except to say that Linspire is focusing on its recent release of Freespire 2.0 and the imminent release of Linspire’s multi-Linux distribution software update and management system, CNR.com.
Continue Reading →