Practical Technology

for practical people.

November 23, 2010
by sjvn01
0 comments

Why would you want ultra-fast broadband at home?

After my recent piece on the cost of small office/home office bandwidth was published, I heard from many people. Some sample responses to Verizon’s new monthly deal of 150 Megabits per second (Mbps) down and 35Mbps up for $194.99 include: “I pay $40 a month now and it works fine, why do I want to pay 5x as much for capacity I don’t miss?” “Okay, understand that I do, like 120% of my work on the Internet, I don’t think I could justify ~$200/month.” And, “You buying? Then yes. Otherwise, ha ha ha ha ha.”

OK. I get it. Verizon is going to have a hard row to hoe to find customers willing to pay almost $200 a month for business-class broadband. The reasons Verizon gives for people to want to the deal that “consumers can download a two-hour, standard-definition movie (1.5 gigabytes) in less than 80 seconds, and a two-hour HD movie (5 GB) in less than four and a half minutes,” and, “Downloading 20 high-resolution photographs (100 megabytes) would take less than five and a half seconds using the 150/35 Mbps service. With the 35 Mbps upstream speed, consumers can upload those same 20 high-resolution photos in less than 23 seconds,” aren’t that compelling. Well, not at that price-point anyway.

I see compelling reasons coming though.

More >

November 23, 2010
by sjvn01
0 comments

Who really bought Novell? Microsoft.

Who really bought Novell? Of course, I know that Attachmate is the company that’s on record as purchasing Novell for $2.2-billion, while Microsoft shelled out $450 million for some Novell intellectual property. But tell me, where did Attachmate get $2.2-billion? Could it have been Microsoft? I think so.

I’ve covered Attachmate over the years, so I knew who they were when the news broke that Attachmate had purchased Novell. What I couldn’t see was where the heck they had gotten the money for the deal. Attachmate’s main business over the years has been software terminal emulation. That’s a business line that’s been dying ever since the Web came along in the early 90s.

I mean who needs to emulate a mainframe 3270 terminal, a mini-computer VT-102 terminal, or even a Windows-based X-term today? There are only a handful of people who still need that kind of thing. In short, even with its NetIQ systems and security management subsidiary, Attachmate is a niche company in a declining industry segment. There’s no way they had a spare billion and change to buy Novell.

There’s also no real synergy between Attachmate’s offerings and Novell’s. From a business standpoint this is a deal that might have made sense in the late 80s or early 90s, when PC-based X-terminals were much more useful in working with Unix and Linux servers. Today, the deal, as its being presented to the public, makes no sense to me.

Unless, of course, Microsoft is the company that’s actually controlling the purse strings. Then, the deal makes perfect sense.

First, it’s a great tactical move because it keeps Novell SUSE Linux out of the hands of VMware. The last thing Microsoft wanted was for VMware, its major cloud and virtualization rival, to have a major operating system to offer to its customers. Microsoft is having a hard enough time getting its Hyper-V virtualization and Azure cloud marketing story straight without having to compete with the one-two punch of VMware and SUSE Linux.

There’s also a strategic move here as well. Had VMware, or some other strong, independent company, picked up SUSE Linux, the new owner might well have distanced itself from Novell’s partnership with Microsoft. Microsoft wants that bridge into Linux. In its ideal world, Microsoft would have everyone running Windows Server 2008 R2 on their servers, but Microsoft is practical enough to know that’s not going to happen. Thanks to its Novell partnership, it’s been able to offer customers Linux and Windows interoperability.

So, why didn’t Microsoft just buy out Novell itself? Because it couldn’t. Any such move would have triggered a long, nasty anti-trust suit and that’s not a lawsuit that Microsoft could have won.

Microsoft might have been able to get away with buying a Linux company, but don’t forget that Novell also owns Unix’s intellectual property. While the pure Unix operating systems, like Solaris and AIX, are declining in the marketplace, their descendants, which include everything from Linux to Mac OS X, are everywhere.

Instead Microsoft used Attachmate as a proxy to take Novell off the operating system chess board as an independent Linux company. At the same time, it retains enough direct and in-direct control of Novell and its intellectual property to put them into play if needed to put trouble into Red Hat, Android, or Ubuntu’s paths.

I don’t have a bit of proof for this mind you. Both Attachmate and Microsoft are being remarkably close-mouthed about what exactly they’ve bought and what they plan for their pieces of Novell. What I do have is decades of watching Microsoft bully its opposition. From that viewpoint, this seems like a logical Microsoft move.

Maybe I’m wrong. If I am, events will prove me to be off-base. I fear I’m not and this move will end up hurting all Linux companies. Time will tell.

A version of this story first appeared in ComputerWorld.>

November 22, 2010
by sjvn01
0 comments

How much would you spend for home broadband?

What’s the most you’ve ever paid for your small-office/home-office (SOHO) Internet broadband? For me, it was $350 a month, but that was in the late 80s and I had a fractional T1 using frame-relay direct to my house. In those days, it was worth it. In 2010, I have a 25 megabits per second (Mbps) Charter Internet connection that’s running me $55 a month. It’s not fast enough, but it’s as fast as I can get in Asheville, NC. If I lived somewhere else though I could get Verizon’s new 150/35 Internet service… for $194.99

Hmmm… given a choice, I’d probably pay that. But, then, I watch Internet video all the time, and I also have two dozen computers on my “home” network. What about you? Would 150Mbps be overkill? Is not quite $200 a month be too expensive?

Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS) 3.0, will bring160 Mbps down and 120 Mbps up to ordinary cable users who don’t have fibre to their doorstep. In theory, DOCSIS 3.0 will be available to 99% of cable users by 2013.

Eh… I’m not so sure that’s going to happen that fast.

More >

November 22, 2010
by sjvn01
4 Comments

Dark horse Attachmate buys Novell with Microsoft’s help

VMware wanted to buy Novell, but the virtualization company didn’t want to buy everything that Novell’s board wanted to sell. At the same time, Microsoft had made it clear that it hated the idea of VMware, a Microsoft rival, ending up as Novell’s owner. The result was that Attachmate bought Novell for $2.2 billion while Microsoft paid $450 million for as yet unnamed Novell intellectual property.

Attachmate has agreed to acquire Novell for $6.10 per share in cash. Attachmate, which got its start as a terminal emulation company in 1982, is privately held. Its primary owners are the private equity firms Francisco Partners, Golden Gate Capital and Thoma Bravo. Today, the Attachmate side of the company still works in X Window and terminal emulation. Its other half, NetIQ, sells and services systems and security management software.

Since Attachmate is a private company, it doesn’t have to announce earnings. That said, it seems highly unlikely that Attachmate alone can afford Novell‘s multi-billion dollar price tag. The funding must be coming from its private-equity owners and possibly other partners.

While none of the parties to this deal have talked to me, sources close to the buyout tell me Attachmate and Microsoft partnered up to make the acquisition sweet enough for Novell’s board.

Specifically, in its press release, Novell stated: "Novell also announced it has entered into a definitive agreement for the concurrent sale of certain intellectual property assets to CPTN Holdings LLC, a consortium of technology companies organized by Microsoft Corporation, for $450 million in cash, which cash payment is reflected in the merger consideration to be paid by Attachmate Corporation."

At this time, we don’t know exactly what Microsoft has bought. We do know that Microsoft’s goal of making sure Novell didn’t end up in VMware’s hands has been achieved. It’s also likely that Novell’s long-running WordPerfect lawsuit against Microsoft is now dead. And Microsoft may have gained intellectual property rights that it believes could be used against Linux vendors that don’t partner with Microsoft.

As for Novell’s future, Attachmate will split Novell into two business units, Novell and SUSE, to go with its other holdings, Attachmate and NetIQ. In a statement, Ron Hovsepian, president and CEO of Novell said, "We are pleased that these transactions appropriately recognize the value of Novell’s relationships, technology and solutions, while providing our stockholders with an attractive cash premium for their investment … We also believe the transaction with Attachmate Corporation will deliver important benefits to Novell’s customers, partners and employees by providing opportunities for building on Novell’s brands, innovation and market leadership."

In the same statement, Jeff Hawn, chairman and CEO of Attachmate, said, "We are very excited about this transaction as it greatly complements our existing portfolio. Novell has an established record of innovation, impressive technology and brand assets, and a leading ecosystem of partnerships and talented employees. The addition of Novell to our Attachmate and NetIQ businesses will enhance the spectrum of solutions we can offer to customers. We fully support Novell’s commitment to its customers and we look forward to continuing to invest for the benefit of Novell’s customers and partners."

Novell’s customers and partners aren’t too sure that this new ownership will be to their benefits. While no one was willing to go on record yet, several major partners said that that they would be reconsidering their strategic Linux relationships as a result of the deal. Until it becomes clear exactly what will be happening with Attachmate’s SUSE and how Microsoft fits into this deal with its intellectual property purchase, I think any Novell SUSE Linux customers or partners would do well to be cautious for the next few months.

November 19, 2010
by sjvn01
0 comments

Use IPv6 in Windows 7 Today

As people debate how serious the coming Internet IPv4 shortage really is going to be and when they should migrate to IPv6, some of them may already be using IPv6 every day, and not know it. Seriously.

You see Windows 7 doesn’t just come with IPv6 already installed, it actually uses it for two very different network applications: DirectAccess and HomeGroup.

DirectAccess

The first one, DirectAccess is for enterprise users. DirectAccess, which you get with Windows 7 Enterprise and Ultimate, when used with Server 2008 R2 combines IPv6 with Internet Protocol security (IPSec) to provide a high-speed, Virtual Private Network (VPN). DirectAccess’ built-in VPN is great for stopping network snoopers using Firesheep.

In addition, DirectAccess can be integrated with Network Access Protection (NAP). NAP automatically checks that a remote PC has up-to-date software and the proper policy-set security settings. If need be, the network administrator can set NAP to update the computer and reset its security. So, for example, with DirectAccess and NAP, you can not just block a non-compliant PC from your intranet; you can automatically patch it, add the corporate standard anti-virus client, set it to your desired security settings, and then let it on the network.

I love this combination of features. Once set up properly, it makes managing and securing remote PC so much easier.

More >

November 17, 2010
by sjvn01
0 comments

Hulu Plus Arrives

I’m a fan of watching TV over the Internet, so I was pleased to see that Hulu Plus has finally opened its door to anyone. After using it for the last few weeks, as a beta tester though, I’m not as happy with it as I had hoped to be. Darn it.

Part of that is that even with a 20Mbps cable connection and an optimized 802.11n link between my router, a Linksys Simultaneous Dual-N Band Wireless Router WRT610N and my Sony BDP-S570 Blu-ray Disc Player I’m still seeing latency and lag at times during evening TV prime time. I’m not surprised. After all, I predicted that this would happen.

You see, Netflix was already gobbling up a lot of bandwidth during those same hours. In all seriousness, that wasn’t leaving a lot of bandwidth for other bandwidth hungry video applications like Hulu Plus. As I’ve said before, there’s not enough last mile bandwidth for Google TV, Apple TV, and Roku’s bandwidth demands.

More >