Practical Technology

for practical people.

May 27, 2008
by sjvn01
0 comments

RIP, Levanta

It seemed like such a great idea. Linux is moving from edge and departmental servers to the data center, so why not offer Linux data center automation, complete with virtualization Linux lifecycle management? Well, maybe it’s still a great business idea, but Levanta wasn’t able to make a go of it.

Officially, there’s still no word that the San Mateo, Calif.-based company is out of business, but former employees say that the company laid them off on April 1. The list of those who were fired ranges from clerical support to Madhur Kohli, the company’s former vice president of engineering.

According to sources close to the deceased company, what put the final nails in their coffin was that after accepting $8 million in second-round venture capital from vSpring Capital and Levensohn Venture Partners in October 2007, the company was unable to show that it could shift its focus to enterprise and data-center-sized Linux management projects.

The venture capital companies, which had already been supporting Levanta, were disappointed when the company’s attempted shift from focusing on its Linux management appliances to becoming a full-time Linux data center automation company came to little. Or, as one former staffer put it, “We were never going to even be able to play in that market. There wasn’t enough there, there.”

In addition, the small company — approximately 20 employees at the end — had management problems. Levanta’s former senior director of services, Michael Perry, who had been laid off in December 2006, said in his blog that “I will miss it and what it might have been; but I’ll never miss a whole subset of the cast of characters who thought they were above the laws of space and time. No you were not as it turns out. You made the failure as much as if you drove the car. You simply cannot run the company like it’s your personal kingdom. Sorry.”

Another problem, a source said, was that as virtualization has grown to being an important part of any Linux server farm operation, Levanta’s existing software didn’t scale well to these new tasks. It did well as the basis for small to medium-sized business appliances. It didn’t do half so well at enterprise-sized tasks.

Worse still, Levanta, as it tried to switch target audiences, found itself going up against strongly entrenched virtualization management companies like VMware. In addition, far better known companies such as Hewlett-Packard, IBM, and Sun were moving into data center and virtualization management.

A direct strike against Levanta, according to one source, came when major Linux distributor Novell bought PlateSpin, which already had a significant presence in the data center automation and virtualization market. This deal, which closed on March 30, gave Novell an immediate presence in Levanta’s new market. Pouring salt into Levanta’s wounds, PlateSpin also brought Novell its existing data center partnerships with Citrix, Microsoft, and Unisys.

This deal also left no room for Levanta with its Novell partnership. While Levanta still had partnerships with IBM, HP, and Red Hat and significant customer sales to mid-sized businesses such as ServerTweak, a server and co-location service provider, and Automated License Systems, a multi-state hunting license service, the company’s product sales were not enough to keep Levanta in business.

Without enough revenue from its old appliance market and facing not only the old data center powers but Novell and PlateSpin as well, Levanta’s backers decided to pull the plug. It was not a coincidence that the Novell news came just ahead of Levanta closing its door.

Today, the venture capitalists are still trying to sell the company’s intellectual property, but the company itself seems destined to join its predecessor, Linuxcare — the first major Linux support company — in the pages of business history.

A version of this story was first published in Linux.com.

May 27, 2008
by sjvn01
0 comments

Going out of business sale! Buy XP before it’s too late!

“Last Chance!” Read the e-mail ad from Dell’s small-business division. “June 18th is the last day you can choose your operating system: Windows XP or Windows Vista.”

That’s not true at all as Gregg Keizer points out in FAQ: XP deathwatch, T minus 5 weeks, but there is enough truth in it that Dell’s not being shy about saying “act fast, because after June 18, Windows XP will no longer be offered on Dell laptops and desktops.”

I don’t recall ever seeing any company advertising the ‘old’ product over the ‘new’ product so strongly before, but Vista’s stink has grown so strong that it makes good business sense to promote XP over Vista. Has anyone ever been actually able to make a solid case for using Vista over XP? I haven’t seen one.

More >

May 25, 2008
by sjvn01
1 Comment

Vista selling well!?

Whatever drugs Steve Ballmer is on they must be very, very good.

That’s the only explanation I can come up with for Ballmer telling the Australian press that he’s “amazing pleased” with Vista sales.

Unlike arguing the virtues of XP vs. Vista, or, as has increasing become the discussion, Linux vs. Mac OS vs. Vista vs. XP, where personal preferences comes into play, no CEO could possibly be happy with their main product’s sales if it were Vista.

More >

May 24, 2008
by sjvn01
2 Comments

Testing the new SUSE Linux Enterprise 10 SP2

In Novell’s new SUSE Linux Enterprise 10 SP2, announced yesterday, you’ll find only small, but useful, improvements, most of them for better interoperability with Microsoft protocols and formats.

SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES) 10 SP2 includes support for fully virtualized Windows Server 2008 and Windows Server 2003. Novell claims system administrators can also migrate these Windows Server guests across physical machines in real-time. Because of the Microsoft/Novell partnership, SLES is the only third-party virtualization solution offering full Microsoft support for its Windows Server guests. In return, the Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V hypervisor, now a release candidate, also supports SLES as a virtual guest.

SLES also includes the Xen 3.2 virtualization hypervisor.

The new SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop (SLED) 10 SP2 continues the Microsoft interoperability theme. For example, SLED 10 SP2 now supports read and write access to local NTFS drive partitions. This functionality is also available in other Linux distributions thanks to the open source NTFS-3G driver.

Both the server and desktop versions of SUSE Linux also have better Active Directory (AD) integration. This is also an area where, thanks to Microsoft being forced to open its network server protocols to open source groups like Samba, other Linux distributions will be able to offer similar functionality. That said, for now Novell offers the best Microsoft network integration, and SUSE Linux is likely to be the only Linux that receives official Microsoft support for its AD network integration.

On the desktop, I put SLED 10 SP2 through its paces on an IBM ThinkPad R61, which had come with SLED 10 SP1 pre-installed. Installation was not as straightforward as I would have liked. For example, you can’t simply tell YaST, the SUSE administration tool, to automatically upgrade to SP2. Instead, you must be certain that you’re up-to-date with your previous patches, then update with the “Update to Service Pack 2 patch,” manually set YaST to use the new SP2 Installation Source server, then apply the product-sled10-sp2 and slesp2o-sp2_online patch and reboot. It’s easier by far to simply download the media, which is available both as a set of CDs and a DVD, and boot from your optical drive and just follow the instructions for an update. For the details of the process see the Novell SLED 10 SP2 deployment page.

Once installed, you will find it easier to get SLED to work with an AD-based network. I had less trouble than I had ever had in integrating the laptop into my Server 2008/2003 hybrid AD/domain network. I also took the network down and brought it back up as a pure AD network and, again, working with SLED 10 SP2 on it was painless.

Perhaps the most significant changes in the new software, from a user’s viewpoint, are the upgrades to OpenOffice.org 2.4 Novell Edition. I was able to run several moderately complex Excel spreadsheets in OpenOffice.org Calc, thanks to its improved Visual Basic for Applications macro support. Impress can also now show Microsoft PowerPoint presentations with embedded audio and video.

Writer can both read and write documents, spreadsheets, and presentations in Microsoft’s basic Open XML (Office 2007) formats. This functionality is also available in a standalone program, OpenOffice.OpenXML Translator 1.1.1. This program will only work though with Novell’s 2.4 version of OpenOffice.

In the minus column, SLED 10 SP2 has a surprising hole. This desktop doesn’t come with a working Novell client. If you’re still using NetWare on the back end, you’ve got a real problem. A patch should be out shortly so that the SLED 10 SP1 client will work properly. There’s also a fix you can put in yourself if you don’t mind a tiny bit of code editing.

For the most part, SLED 10 SP2 worked well for me, though I found more “fit and polish” problems than I would have expected from a major release. Still, on the server side, anyone who needs to get their Linux servers to work hand in glove with Windows servers should start testing SLES 10 SP2. As for the desktop, I’d wait a few weeks for the minor bugs to be shaken out before upgrading.

A version of this story first appeared in NewsForge.

May 23, 2008
by sjvn01
0 comments

Security is futile!

Surrender now! All your base are belong to us. Exterminate! Exterminate!

Well, that’s probably not what Cisco’s chief security officer John Stewart meant when he told attendees at an Australian security conference that malware is growing so fast that, “If patching and antivirus is where I spend my money, and I’m still getting infected and I still have to clean up computers and I still need to reload them and still have to recover the user’s data and I still have to reinstall it, the entire cost equation of that is a waste. It’s completely wasted money.”

On second thought, maybe that is what Stewart meant!

More >

May 22, 2008
by sjvn01
3 Comments

Those Dumb South Africans

Those dumb South Africans don’t just get it seems to be Microsoft’s senior director of interoperability’s Jason Matusow message in his blog posting of May 19th.

In this piece, trying to present a case for proprietary software over open-source software because people don’t understand that free software isn’t free as in ‘free beer,’ Matusow does an amazing job of putting his foot in his mouth.

Matusow starts out well enough, “South Africa has taken a most unfortunate position of late – the government has sought to put a political mandate in place for the adoption of open source software. I am against all technology mandates, and this one is no different.” OK, I can agree with the idea that technology mandates aren’t a bright idea.

Then, Matusow moves into Microsoft FUD-land, he makes some rather wonky claims about how Linux, Ubuntu in particular, trap people into an operating system. He states that “There is absolutely no comprehension that the Linux they will deploy on an enterprise scale will be completely locked down by commercial services agreements and version controls by the apps vendors (e.g. SAP).” Excuse me, the last I knew Linux wasn’t locked down by any ISV (independent software vendor). If you want to talk about ‘lock-down,’ then you want to talk about Microsoft. But, OK, this is still from the Microsoft FUD playbook. He hopes to get people thinking that open-source an proprietary software are essentially the same thing. Dumb, to people who know better, but then he’s not talking to us.

Continue Reading →