Practical Technology

for practical people.

September 24, 2008
by sjvn01
0 comments

IBM takes a stand against bad standards

Bad standards and standard wars are an all too common part of modern information technology. Now, IBM has announced that it’s not going to put up with them anymore. And, yes, Microsoft, IBM is looking at you.

In a statement, Ari Fishkind, public affairs manager for IBM Research’s Development and Intellectual Property section, says that “IBM is announcing a new corporate policy governing its participation in the technology standards community. As members of that community, we are formalizing a commitment to behave in a progressive and transparent way as we promote open, high quality standards.”

Fishkind says IBM will be judging “how consistent the behavior of standards development organizations are with these ideals will help determine our membership in these groups.” Specifically, IBM complained that “the traditional standards community runs the risk of alienating developing countries” and is giving them the “perception that they are being marginalized or ignored outright, and that rules are being changed on the fly.”

More >

September 23, 2008
by sjvn01
0 comments

The Android phone is here! So what?

OK, I’m really pleased that Linux does so well in the mobile phone space. I’m very happy to see Google’s Linux-powered Android phone make its first appearance. But, come on, who buys a phone for its operating system?

I know some people disagree with me. ABI Research director Kevin Burden, for example, said “Today’s unveiling of the T-Mobile G1, the first mobile phone based on the Android platform from the Google-spawned Open Handset Alliance (OHA), may be the beginning of a significant movement towards a situation in which a majority of mobile phones will run a high-level operating system, rather than the variety of real-time operating systems currently powering more than 85% of the world’s mobile phones.”

That’s all fine and dandy, but I’ll bet that most people still buy phones because of the plan price than any other single factor. Of course, there is the one exception: the Apple iPhone. We love the iPhone, problems and all.

More >

September 23, 2008
by sjvn01
1 Comment

The Real State of the Blogosphere

Technorati , perhaps the best site that tracks blogs, has just issued a new report on what’s what with the wild wonderful world of blogs: Technorati’s State of the Blogosphere 2008 report. There’s some interesting material here, but don’t trust the overview materials. Look at the numbers instead.

The most glaring example this is the section called: Blogs are Profitable. It reads: “The majority of bloggers we surveyed currently have advertising on their blogs. Among those with advertising, the mean annual investment in their blog is $1,800, but it’s paying off. The mean annual revenue is $6,000 with $75K+ in revenue for those with 100,000 or more unique visitors per month. Note: median investment and revenue (which is listed below) is significantly lower. They are also earning CPMs (cost-per-thousand impressions).”

Sounds good at first doesn’t it? Make money with blogs! Yea! Take a look at the report’s real numbers. The median annual income is $200. That sure doesn’t sound profitable to me.

Continue Reading →

September 22, 2008
by sjvn01
0 comments

Let’s talk cheap software

Want to know one of the things I really like about open-source software? The price.

Yes, I know, I know. It’s ‘free as in freedom, not free as in beer.” Trust me. I get that. I also get though that open-source software gives you quality programs either for free or for a support fee that’s often a fraction of the cost of proprietary software.

Of course, thank you, Robert A. Heinlein, TANSTAAFL (There’s no such thing as a free lunch). If you’re going to use any software, you’re going to pay for it in one way or another. You need to learn how to use it. If you’re in a business, you need to learn how to maintain it. You people know the drill.

But, one of the most important things about open-source software is that, once you have the knowledge, you don’t need to spend any more money on it. I mean Novell or Red Hat will be happy to take your money for support contracts, but if you have enough people in your organization who know SLES (SUSE Linux Enterprise Server) or RHEL (Red Hat Enterprise Linux), there’s no reason you couldn’t run openSUSE, Fedora, or CentOS, which is based on the RHEL source code. Many companies already do that.

More >

September 22, 2008
by sjvn01
0 comments

VirtualBox update brings improved performance and 64-bit support

Sun has released the first update to its recently purchased desktop virtualization program, now called Sun xVM VirtualBox 2.0. While not a major update, it does bring improved performance and 64-bit operating system support to the popular open source virtualization program.

VirtualBox, now part of Sun’s xVM series, runs on a wide variety of host operating systems, including 32- and 64-bit versions of Linux, Mac OS X, OpenSolaris, Solaris, and Windows. However, while the manual claims that it supports 64-bit Mac OS X, the program doesn’t actually support it yet. That said, VirtualBox runs a remarkable number of operating systems on any of these platforms, from MS-DOS and Windows 98 to OpenBSD and OS/2.

In my tests, I limited myself to hosting VirtualBox on openSUSE 11 and Windows XP SP3. The openSUSE system runs on a Hewlett-Packard Pavilion a6040n Desktop PC with a 1.86GHz Intel Core 2 Duo E6320 processor, 2GB of RAM, and a 320GB SATA hard drive. For XP, I used a Dell Inspiron 530s with a 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo E4600 CPU with 3GB of RAM and a 500GB SATA hard drive. On both systems, I installed Ubuntu 8.04 and Fedora 9 as guest operating systems. On the openSUSE PC, I also installed XP SP3.

In every case, my installations of VirtualBox and then the guest operating systems went flawlessly. However, other users might run into some quirks. For example, VirtualBox works on any PC with an x86 architecture, and it supports Intel’s VT-x and AMD’s AMD-V hardware virtualization components; however, it doesn’t check for these architectures, nor does it support either by default. If you have the right chip set, you can turn on support manually via the program’s control center.

On Linux, you’ll also need to add users to the vboxusers group before you can use the program. VirtualBox creates this group when you install it, but it doesn’t add any users to it — not even the user who’s installing VirtualBox. When you install VirtualBox and try to run it for the first time, you might get the “VirtualBox kernel driver not accessible, permission problem” error message. That’s because the current user isn’t a member of vboxusers. Once you add that person to the group and have him log in again, he should be able to run VirtualBox.

VirtualBox is a lean, mean hypervisor. It only takes up approximately 30MB of hard drive space. However, to use it, you’ll need multiple gigabytes of disk for the virtualized operating system and its files. You can choose to either set up a fixed amount of space or allow VirtualBox to take up more drive space as needed. In my experience, it’s better to let VirtualBox manage its hard drive requirements.

You’ll also need enough RAM for your base operating system and every virtual machine (VM) instance. For example, to run Linux as a host with XP as a guest VM, you’ll need at least 1GB of RAM. For Vista as a guest, you’ll need at least 4GB. My general rule of thumb is to only run guest operating systems on computers with at least double their minimum RAM requirements. On my systems, all the guest operating systems ran at what appeared to be their full hardware speeds.

If I had high-end graphic cards or networking interface cards on either system, it would have been a different story. VirtualBox is a paravirtualization virtual program, which means the VM accesses some system devices as virtual devices. So, for example, no matter how fancy your graphics card is, you’re only going to get 16-bit VESA-grade video. That’s good, but no one is ever going to call it great. VirtualBox also uses a virtual AMD PCnet family Ethernet card for the guest operating system’s networking needs, regardless of what’s actually installed on your PC.

Despite the potential for graphics confusion, switching back and forth from the host to the guest operating system is as smooth as silk. Had I been running 3-D Compiz Fusion graphics on openSUSE, however, it would have been a different story. You should be fine as long as you stick with plain-Jane graphics.

For reasons beyond my understanding, several of VirtualBox’s most useful functions, such as setting up the Shared Folders common drive space for trading files smoothly between the host and guest operating system, are not installed by default. Instead, they’re in VirtualBox’s Guest Additions.

The documentation implies that VirtualBox Guest Additions is a standalone ISO disc image. It’s not. It’s actually included in the VirtualBox program, but to get it, you must first set up and start a VM. Then choose Install Guest Addons from the Devices menu on the VirtualBox window that frames the running VM. This mounts the Guest Additions program’s ISO file.

Once it’s mounted, open it and run the appropriate program for the guest operating system. For Linux, that’s a shell program with the .run extension. Then shut down the VM and set up a Shared Folder using the VirtualBox Details window. Finally, mount the new Shared Folder using net use drive-name \\vboxsvr\NameOfSharedDirectory for Windows. In Linux, make a mount point for the drive using mkdir -p /cdrive, then mount the shared folder with mount -t vboxsf c_drive /cdrive.

If that seems too complicated, well, it is. Since I run a serious network, I tend to replace this functionality with Samba-based shared network drives. But if you’re using only one or two PCs, you’ll find it worthwhile to set up a Shared Folder.

You may want some other functionality that’s available only in a version of VirtualBox that contains proprietary software. This bundle includes a Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) server, USB device support, USB over RDP support, an iSCSI initiator that lets you use iSCSI drives, and a virtual SATA controller. In my experience, the fully open source version of VirtualBox does include some USB support. For example, I was able to use a USB mouse without any problems.

VirtualBox runs extremely well. Over the course of almost a week of constant work on the systems, I couldn’t find a single Windows or Linux program that didn’t run correctly on a VirtualBox guest.

Even with the Shared Drive setup headaches, VirtualBox is equal to the purely proprietary VMware Workstation and better than most other open source desktop virtualization programs — although Parallels Desktop remains the best desktop virtualization program for Mac users. For the rest of us, though, open source VirtualBox is the desktop virtualizer of choice.

A version of this story first appeared in Linux.com. >

September 22, 2008
by sjvn01
0 comments

What’s Red Hat Doing in the Virtualization Business?

Even before Red Hat bought the virtualization company Qumranet, with its Linux KVM (Kernel Virtual Machine) platform, Red Hat had made it clear that it was moving into virtualization in a big way. At its annual Red Hat Summit in June, the Linux powerhouse announced that it would be deploying its Embedded Linux Hypervisor, oVirt, which is based on KVM in its server line. This lightweight, embeddable hypervisor currently enables users to run run Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Windows VMs on Linux.

Now that Red Hat owns Qumranet, Scott Crenshaw, Red Hat’s VP of the Platform Business Unit, explains that Red Hat made the move for three reasons. First, to “accelerate time to market for a broad virtualization solution;” then to keep KVM open source, and further the investment in it.” And, finally to “extend our virtualization product line into the VDI (Virtual Desktop Infrastructure) market.”

Crenshaw then explains in more detail that “KVM will form the basis of Red Hat’s embedded hypervisor product, which is slated for release early next year. We have strong interest from customers and OEMs to bring the advantages of this Linux bare metal hypervisor to the market.”

“If and when,” continues Crenshaw, “KVM gets deployed into Red Hat Enterprise Linux is still being determined. We designed into RHEL virtualization the industry’s first open-source, open-standards interface allowing new hypervisors and management tools to be deployed with plug-and-play ease. So managing any transition will be seamless for customers.”

More >