Practical Technology

for practical people.

April 21, 2009
by sjvn01
0 comments

Will Microsoft blow its netbook lead with Windows 7 crippleware?

When netbooks first came along, they almost all ran Linux. Microsoft, which was stuck with the resource pig known as Windows Vista, simply couldn’t compete. So, reluctantly, Microsoft gave Windows XP Home a new lease on life and sold it below cost to OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) to kill the Linux desktop at the root. For this cost, Microsoft was successful, but now Microsoft is about to blow it by replacing XP Home with Windows 7 Starter Edition, which is crippleware by any other name.

Microsoft has been selling crippleware, software that’s deliberately had features removed, for some time. The only real difference, for example, between XP Home and XP Pro, besides the price-tag, was that XP Home couldn’t handle business domain or AD (Active Directory) networking. To get this one feature activated, millions of business users paid an average of $80 more per PC.

Today, Microsoft continues to sell XP, but the company really, really doesn’t want to do this. Why? Because Microsoft is losing money, especially on netbooks, when you buy XP. According to the Wall Street Journal, “the company takes in less than $15 per netbook for Windows XP once marketing rebates are taken into account — far less than the estimated $50 to $60 it receives for PCs running Windows Vista.”

Actually, my friends at the OEMs tell me that it’s not even $15. Try about $7 a copy. At either price, Microsoft is losing money every time you buy a copy of XP. Is it any wonder that Microsoft is laying off employees and admitting that its client (Windows desktop) revenue declined 8% as a result of PC market weakness and a continued shift to lower priced netbooks?”

Now Microsoft has billions to burn, but is crushing the Linux desktop worth losing $384-million of revenue a quarter? I don’t think so, and neither does Microsoft.

This is why Microsoft has been claiming that Windows 7 will run just great on netbooks. Except, now they’re not. Now, Microsoft is telling us that instead of full-strength Windows 7, you’ll be getting Windows 7 Starter Edition instead.

Windows 7 Starter Edition limits you to three applications running at once. That’s not quite as bad as it sounds.

For instance, an anti-virus program running as a service doesn’t count against the limit and neither does running multiple tabs or windows with one application. Of course, if you’re like me and you’re always running a Web browser, an e-mail client, an IM client and a word processor, you’re out of luck. I can see users throwing their netbooks in sheer frustration against the wall when they try, and fail, to run four applications at once.

You also won’t get Aero Glass; remote desktop; network domain or AD support; and BitLocker/BitLocker to Go encryption on the Starter Edition. In short, it’s crippleware.

So, will users want to pay $100 more per netbook just for Windows 7? I doubt it. So does Intel blogger Josh Bancroft, who wrote, “adding, say, [US] $100 to the cost of a $400 netbook just to pay for Windows 7 is going to be a tough proposition all around.” I strongly suspect Microsoft will ask less than a $100 per copy of the Starter Edition, but even so it’s hard to see someone wanting to buy this version.

I mean, come on, on the Dell Mini 9 with Ubuntu 8.04, I get not just a full desktop with no limitations, but I also get an office suite and a slew of other applications as well. Heck, I even get a remote desktop, thanks to VNC; Windows AD and domain networking; and disk encryption. These are all features that Microsoft offers, but not on Starter Edition.

Doesn’t this Microsoft move tell us what we all really know about Microsoft if we’re honest? That Microsoft is in the business of ripping off its customers for every dime they can, and if they can fool people into buying a high-priced, defective-by-design version of Windows they’re going to do it.

Just remember, you do have a choice. You can buy desktop Linux. Or, if can’t break yourself of the Windows habit, at the least, go for XP, instead of Windows 7 Starter Edition. It will still be your better, not to mention cheaper, netbook choice.

A version of this story first appeared in ComputerWorld.>

April 20, 2009
by sjvn01
2 Comments

Here comes Ubuntu 9.04

Almost over-looked in the aftermath of the news of Oracle buying Sun, Canonical announced today, April 20th, that the final version of its next generation of Ubuntu, 9.04, will be available for download on April 23rd.

I’ve already reviewed the release candidate of Ubuntu 9.04, and I like it. I like it a lot.

Besides the main desktop release, Canonical is also releasing the Ubuntu 9.04 Netbook Remix. This is a version that’s designed to work well on the limited resources of a netbook like the Dell Mini 9. That said, you can, of course, run ordinary Ubuntu on a netbook.

Continue Reading →

April 20, 2009
by sjvn01
0 comments

The Five Biggest Changes out of Sun/Oracle

I’d thought about Oracle buying Sun. But, then I thought, "Larry Ellison isn’t that dumb." Well, I was wrong. Ellison is that dumb. Oracle is buying Sun in what may be the most moronic technology acquisition of the 21st century.

I’ve looked at the Oracle/Sun deal. I’ve read Ellison’s explanation as to why the buyout makes sense. I don’t see it. I don’t see any upside to this deal. And, on top of that, Oracle, which spent $7.4 billion for Sun, vastly overpaid for the company. This deal will make money for Sun’s executives and stockholders, but it will prove to be a disaster for Sun’s users, developers, and employees.

You see, I know Sun’s technologies well and I just don’t see a win here. IBM and Sun made sense. Despite their cultural differences, I could see Sun’s software prospering with IBM. But Sun and Oracle? I only see most of Sun’s technologies’ dying with Oracle in charge.

Specifically, here’s how I see it playing out.

1) MySQL is dead. Long live MySQL. Oracle doesn’t have much to say about MySQL. Why should they? They’re going to quietly kill the open-source DBMS as fast as possible.

Unfortunately for Oracle, it’s too late. MySQL, under Sun’s mismanagement, had already forked. MySQL founder, Michael ‘Monty’ Widenius left Sun and started his own community branch of MySQL, MariaDB. His purpose? "To provide a community developed, stable, and always Free branch of MySQL that is, on the user level, compatible with the main version."

That’s one of the things that Ellison, and Microsoft for that matter, don’t get. You can’t kill open-source projects. Companies come and go, but popular open-source programs like MySQL just keep rolling on.

2) Solaris/OpenSolaris. Oracle is making sounds like it wants to do something with Solaris. Just don’t ask me what. Solaris has been declining for years. Oracle uses Linux internally, and it even has its own rip-off of RHEL (Red Hat Enterprise Linux), Oracle Unbreakable Linux.

Ellison can talk all he wants about Sun’s Solaris operating system being "by far the best Unix technology," but so what? Unix is dying. Linux has been eating away at the Unix market for more than a decade. Ellison’s support of Unix makes a good sound-bite, but as a business move it makes no sense. I predict death by neglect for Solaris.

3) Java. Java has value, but Sun’s done a poor job over the years of turning that value into money. Oracle, which uses Java in many of its applications, can certainly put Java to good work in supporting its own products. My question is, "What is Oracle going to do with the Java Community and vice-versa?"

I know some things will happen. NetBeans, for example, is history. Oracle is a big-time Eclipse supporter. As for the rest? I honestly don’t know what Oracle will do with the JCP (Java Community Process). If they’re smart, they’ll get everyone together as soon as possible to spell out their future plans for Java. If Oracle doesn’t, they’ll have Java developers running, not walking, away from the Sun/Oracle Java as fast as they can.

4) SPARC. Oracle can talk all it wants about taking a step back to the past where companies sell hardware and software bundles, but I don’t see it. Fujitsu will continue to make SPARC boxes for that dwindling market, and I expect to see Sun’s x86-server based business getting either spun out as an independent company or sold to Dell or HP. I just can’t see Oracle in the hardware business.

5) Sun’s other open-source programs. I have a bad, bad feeling that Oracle is going to let popular and powerful open-source projects like OpenOffice and VirtualBox wither on the vine. Oracle is willing to spend money on open-source projects that it uses. For example, Oracle is a top contributor to Linux. But, I don’t see these, or Sun’s other open-source projects, contributing to Oracle’s bottom-line, so I don’t see them getting much support.

Over the years, Sun has contributed, albeit reluctantly at times, many great advances in operating systems and open-source software. With this acquisition, those days are done. Good-bye Sun, it was nice to have known you.

A version of this story first appeared in ComputerWorld.

April 19, 2009
by sjvn01
0 comments

How slow can Linux go?

If it has a CPU, you can run Linux on it. Xboxes or iPhones, cars or calculators, Linux can live quite happily on any of these devices. But, when it comes to the desktop or laptop, how much processing power do you need to run a modern Linux desktop?

The short answer to this question is “not much at all.” In fact, I don’t think you could buy a computer at your local Best Buy or online that can’t run Linux.

Let’s take Ubuntu 9.04, which is due to arrive this week. The official minimum requirements for this popular Linux distribution are a 700MHz processor and 256MBs of RAM. I think that’s too low. In my experience, you could run GNOME 2.26 on that slow a processor, but the RAM’s way too low. You could pull it off with 512MBs, but you’d be happier with a Gigabyte.

More >

April 16, 2009
by sjvn01
1 Comment

The five best, new things in Ubuntu Linux 9.04

I’ve been using Jaunty Jackalope–what a name!–for the last few weeks, and I upgraded to the release candidate last night the hard way, i.e. from the source code. I’m impressed. I think you will be too when you download it yourself. The ISO versions are scheduled to be available later today, April 16th, from the usual Ubuntu download sites.

I’ve been running Jaunty on a Gateway 503GR. This is an older PC with a 3GHz Pentium IV CPU, 2GB of RAM, an ATI Radeon 250 graphics card, and a 300GB SATA (Serial Advanced Technology Attachment) hard drive. Even on this 2006 vintage system, Ubuntu ran quite well.

Specifically, here’s what I’ve found, so far, in the new Ubuntu (http://www.ubuntu.com) that I liked, and I think you’ll like as well.

1) X.Org server 1.6/GNOME 2.26. The first part gives you peppier video performance, while the second gives you a really, nice integrated desktop. Particularly nice features include the integration of the Brasero CD/DVD burner with all other Gnome applications and improvements with both audio, PulseAudio, and multiple monitors control and support.

More >

April 15, 2009
by sjvn01
0 comments

The difference between Linux and Windows

I’ve been working a lot with Windows 7 recently. I’ve also, as always, been using Linux distributions like Fedora, SLED (SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop), and Ubuntu. As Windows 7, Ubuntu 9.04 and Fedora 11 all approach their launch dates, I’ve been thinking about the differences in how they’re created and released.

With Windows, Microsoft creates its operating system in a black box. We really don’t know what they’re doing in there. Heck, sometimes, as the launch of Vista showed, even Microsoft doesn’t know what’s going on. That’s changed a bit recently.

No, Microsoft isn’t releasing any significant code to open source. What they are doing, however, is deliberately leaking betas of Windows 7. This not only helps to build up buzz, but it also lets Microsoft get real customer input on what’s really working, or not, with Windows 7.

While Windows 7 is being rushed out ASAP to make up for the Vista sales fiasco, Microsoft is still moving glacially slow by open-source standards. Vista was released on November 30th 2006. I expect to see Windows 7 out in September 2009. In other words, moving as fast as they could, it still took Microsoft almost three years to replace Vista.

More >