Practical Technology

for practical people.

June 23, 2010
by sjvn01
0 comments

Better Readability Today won’t save E-Readers Tomorrow

My goodness. When I wrote about the Barnes & Noble Nook and Amazon Kindle’s price-war as showing the way to the end of dedicated e-readers, I didn’t expect quite so many people to insist I was wrong. Wrong I tell you!

Of course some people, like ZDNet’s Jason Perlow agreed with me that “eReader devices face mass extinction.” A lot of other people flooded me with arguments for why dedicated e-readers would keep going.

Their arguments amounted to two different factors. The first was that Amazon and Barnes & Noble could afford to sell e-readers for ultra-low prices because they made their real money from selling books for this platform. This sort of business policy is known as the razor-blade plan. The idea is you sell something cheaply, the razor itself or, in this case, the e-reader, while making your money from the razors, or book in this example. This works. This same plan is why we can buy great printers for less than the cost of manufacturing while paying through the nose for printer ink and toner.

The problem with this plan is that it breaks with e-readers. Tablets, like Apple’s iPad, and the coming wave of Android Linux-powered and ARM/MeeGo Linux tablets, can do everything that the e-readers do using Amazon and Barnes & Nobles’ own software, and more. Even if you drop e-readers prices below $100, as Ron Miller suggested, you still can’t get around the fact that the competition will be able to do so much more than a dedicated e-reader.

More >

June 23, 2010
by sjvn01
0 comments

Linux’s old KDE 3 desktop lives!?

I love it. KDE 3.x, which has always remained my favorite Linux desktop interface, is making a come back. A tiny group of open-source developers from Pearson Computing is trying to bring KDE 3.x from the grave in a project that they’re calling Trinity.

I’m not sure how much will come from this project. The group behind Trinity seems to be quite small and the Web site has been swamped to the point where it’s been unusable. Still, the very fact that someone is trying to keep KDE 3.5 alive is good news as far as I’m concerned. After all, I am the guy who suggested that KDE be forked into KDE 4 and KDE 3 branches back when KDE 4.1 was the newest KDE desktop.

Specifically, according to the lead developer, Timothy Pearson, on the KDE 3.5 Maintainers page the project is meant to support “KDE3.5 for Ubuntu Intrepid and above. Emphasis is placed on keeping KDE3.5 as a viable Ubuntu desktop environment, easily installed and used alongside others, just like Gnome, XFCE, and KDE4.x.”

While I’ve warmed to KDE 4 beginning with the KDE 4.3 edition, I’m still not crazy about it. For me, at least, KDE 3.5x is still easier to use and manage. Indeed, I still use KDE 3.5.10, the last official version on my main Linux desktop, which runs the Debian Linux variant MEPIS 8.

More >

June 23, 2010
by sjvn01
0 comments

Google Voice: The Web’s best free voice app

I’m going to let you in on a little secret. I hate the telephone. I hate being interrupted when I’m in the middle of writing. I can’t stand mobile phones, although I use them, and I’ve gotten sick and tired of buying both new landline and mobile phones every other year. Those are some of the reasons why I think Google releasing Google Voice for everyone — well everyone in the U.S. — is great news.

It’s also great news for anyone who wants free — that’s free as in beer — control of their telephone communications. Google Voice is a free Web-based application that gives you control over all your various phone numbers — work, home, mobile, you name it — from a single, central phone number. And it includes most of the features of a PBX (Private Branch Exchange): call forwarding, voice mail, call recording.

I’ve been lucky enough to be using Google Voice for over a year, and I’m thrilled it’s free for most people now. I’ve wanted to get my friends on it ever since I first used it, and now I can.

More >

June 22, 2010
by sjvn01
0 comments

Bill Gates doesn’t work at Microsoft anymore

Love him or hate him, Bill Gates was, and still is, the face of Microsoft. What Microsoft doesn’t want you to know though is that Gates has almost nothing to do with the company anymore.

That’s what comes across loud and clear in the recent Fortune overview of the world’s richest man. Instead of plotting out how to knock Apple back into the dirt or how to put Google in its place, Gates spends his days on the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, stopping by the laboratories of Intellectual Ventures to talk blue-sky ideas every few weeks with Nathan Myhrvold, and dropping off or picking up his three kids from school.

Bill Gates? The great white-shark of computing doing the suburban dad routine!? Yes, yes he is, albeit I doubt he drives a mini-van.

While this is fine for Gates, it doesn’t bode well for Microsoft. As ace Microsoft reporter Mary Jo Foley, told me when we talked about the article, she liked the article “because it admits what MS doesn’t want out there: Gates is no longer really involved at the company. They are scared for that to be known even though to us it is obvious.”

More >

June 21, 2010
by sjvn01
0 comments

Dedicated E-Readers: They’re History

Barnes & Noble just launched a new Wi-Fi only version of the Nook for $149 and cut the price of the original, with both Wi-Fi and 3G from $259 to $199. Whoops! And, what’s this? I no sooner finish this blog and Amazon drops the bottom-line Kindle’s price to $189. That’s great, right? Wrong. It’s actually just postponing the end of all dedicated e-readers.

As it happens, I like e-readers in general. And, I like the Nook and Amazon’s Kindle. So why am I unimpressed by this price-cut? I’m unmoved because I don’t think there’s a chance in heck that dedicated e-reader devices will still be around, except as vastly discounted electronic toys by 2011’s holiday season.

My reasoning is quite simple. Everything a Nook or a Kindle can do an Apple iPad can do better. And, what’s far more important, an iPad can do far, far more.

Why should I buy a Nook or Kindle to read a book, when I can read the same books, from the same vendors, on an iPad? Or, for that matter, an iPod Touch? As Jason Perlow pointed out in his great overview of iPad e-reader applications, anything you can read on one of those devices, you can read on an iPad.

Besides, with an iPad, I can also listen to music, watch videos, play games, etc. etc. Of course, an iPad is expensive. In fact, it’s a lot more expensive. The cheapest iPad is $499 compared to the new Nook’s bottom line of $149 and the Kindle’s lowest priced model is now $189. But, it’s not going to stay that way. Historically, Apple drops the price of its earlier models when it introduces a new one. While you may lust in your heart for a new iPhone 4, your brain and your wallet might be very happy with the last generation iPhone 3GS, which Wal-Mart will be happy to sell you for $97.

Besides, in the next few months you’re going to see a flood of Linux-powered iPad clones and other tablet devices. I expect these tablets to have prices ranging from $150 to $250 and, thanks to most of them running Google Android, they’ll be able to run many of the same applications that now live on Apple iPads. Besides, when it comes to e-readers, the Nook is an Android Linux device and there’s already a Kindle for Android application.

The one hope that I see for the dedicated e-readers, and Nook already has the foundation to pull it off, is to give up being single-purpose devices and join the general purpose tablet revolution. But, dedicated e-readers, or GPSs, mobile-phones, and the like? They’re history.

A version of this story first appeared in ITWorld.

June 21, 2010
by sjvn01
0 comments

Dell back-tracks on Linux being safer than Windows

Recently Dell did something amazing. The Austin, TX computer giant admitted on one of their Web pages that “Ubuntu [Linux] is safer than Microsoft Windows.” (PDF Link) But, now Dell has backed off to the far more generic “Ubuntu is secure”. Boo!

The explanation for both statements has also changed a bit. When the statement was stronger, Dell’s explanation read, “The vast majority of viruses and spyware written by hackers are not designed to target and attack Linux.” Now, it’s been watered down to ” According to industry reports, Ubuntu is unaffected by the vast majority of viruses and spyware.”

Ah, no. Anyone who pays any attention to operating system security knows that Windows is insecure both by design and by poor execution. Linux, while far from perfect, is far more secure.

You see Windows was designed as a single-user, non-networked operating system. That design is still at the heart of Windows, which is why security must always be an add-on to Windows. Linux, in contrast, was built from the ground up as a multi-user, networked system. Linux, like Unix, which came before it, was constructed to work in a world with hostile users.

More >