Practical Technology

for practical people.

October 7, 2012
by sjvn01
0 comments

One Linux for all ARM systems

ARM processors and Linux have been married for years. You name an ARM-based device—smartphones, Raspberry Pi, tablets—and you’ll find Linux running beside it. It’s not been a happy marriage though. For every ARM system on a chip (SoC) there had to be a different Linux spin. With the forthcoming Linux 3.7 kernel we’re on our way to seeing all ARM processors working with a single Linux kernel.

The problem has always been that while the ARM processor family itself has stayed unified, every vendor’s SoC supports its peripherals in different ways. On x86 PCs we’ve always had the BIOS, and more recently the Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) to provide a common application programming interface (API) for the Linux kernel to hook into. With ARM SoCs, you couldn’t even count on something as generic as General Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) using the same APIs and working the same.

Over the years, as new ARM SoCs and end-user devices have flooded the market, this has really ticked off low-level ARM developers. They ended up having to reinvent the wheel with almost every new chip and device to come down the highway. The higher-level Linux developers were even less happy.

On March 18, 2011, Linus Torvalds had had enough. He wrote, “Gaah. Guys, this whole ARM thing is a f**king pain in the ass.”

One Linux for all ARM systems. More >

October 5, 2012
by sjvn01
0 comments

Will a Chromebook be your next PC?

Sure, you could keep using Windows, although Windows 8 looks worse every time you look at it; or you could buy a Mac for big bucks; or you could buy a  Samsung Series 5 550 Chromebook starting at $449 and have a great Linux-based desktop that you already know how to use.

What’s that? It’s Linux and that’s so complicated. Oh please. Get into the 21st century, Linux is easy enough for grandpa and grandma to use. And, besides if you know how to use the Chrome Web browser–you do know how to use a Web browser right?–then you already know how to use Chrome OS and a Chromebook. If you really want to have the full Linux shell command experience, you can have that too, but it’s purely optional.

Will a Chromebook be your next PC? More >

October 3, 2012
by sjvn01
0 comments

Five great Android tablets you can buy today instead of waiting for the iPad Mini

I like iPads. I own one and often use it. That said, I never cared for its size; Apple’s locked-in, proprietary software ecosystem; and lately Apple’s iOS updates have been including a lot of sloppy mistakes. So it is that more often than not I’ve been using a variety of 7″ Android-powered tablets instead of my iPad. And, you know what? Just because it seems almost certain there will soon be an iPad Mini, I don’t see any reason to be rushing out to buy one.

Why not? From the top: Price. Whatever Apple ends up charging for the Mini, it’s a safe bet it’s going to be more than the 7″ Android tablets. Apple’s never been anyone’s idea of an affordable brand.

Next, I really don’t appreciate Apple’s Big Brother approach to third-party software. For example, the reason you can’t watch most Website videos on an iPad is that Steve Jobs decided he didn’t want Adobe Flash on iDevices. I also really don’t like Apple’s patent lawsuit happy ways.

Last, and to the point, over the last few months, Android and its hardware vendors have finally gotten their tablet act together. In 2010, Android tablets weren’t competitive at all with the mark one iPad. In 2011, the Barnes & Nobles’ Nook Color, while still primarily an e-reader, became a reasonable Android tablet. In late 2011, the small, 7″ Android tablet took off with the introduction of Amazon’s Kindle Fire. Then, as far as I’m concerned, the first Android tablet came along that was actually better than an iPad: the Nexus 7.

Five great Android tablets you can buy today instead of waiting for the iPad Mini. More >

October 2, 2012
by sjvn01
0 comments

A new Apple iOS Wi-Fi problem has popped up while others remain unfixed

Some Apple iPhone and iPad users are facing a major new problem with Wi-Fi/cellular data use while others are still dealing with earlier, unresolved iOS 6 Wi-Fi problems.

The latest annoyance is a real pain-in-the-rump. It turns out that while some of you have been watching videos, playing a game, whatever, on what you thought was a Wi-Fi network, you were actually running up your giant 3G data bill. Apple hasn’t commented on this, but on September 30th, Apple quietly released a bug fix for the problem for its Verizon customers.

In it, Apple states. “This carrier settings update resolves an issue in which, under certain circumstances, iPhone 5 may use Verizon cellular data while the phone is connected to a Wi-Fi network.” Users are loudly saying that is not just a problem with iPhone 5 or Verizon. Instead, they blame iOS 6.

A new Apple iOS Wi-Fi problem has popped up while others remain unfixed. More >

October 2, 2012
by sjvn01
0 comments

UltraViolet: Another DRM dead-end for Internet video

UltraViolet sounded good. “UltraViolet is DVD for the Internet. Just as the DVD logo means that you can buy a DVD from any seller and expect it to play in any player with a DVD logo (DVD players, DVD PCs, DVD entertainment systems in automobiles, and so on), the UltraViolet logo means you can buy UltraViolet movies from any seller, keep track of your ‘online locker’ or ‘virtual collection’ of movies, and expect them to play on anything with the UltraViolet logo (PCs, tablets, smartphones, Blu-ray players, cable set-top boxes, and so on).” Oh well, lots of things sound good at first.

I really liked the idea of having a networked copy of my movies. As it is, I’ve been converting my DVDs to Apple TV MP4 friendly formats with HandBrake. It’s not hard, but it is time-consuming. It would be great if every time I bought a physical DVD I’d also get a digital copy and that’s what UltraViolet seemed to promise.

Alas, my hopes were dashed when I finally looked at UltraViolet’s fine print.

UltraViolet: Another DRM dead-end for Internet video. More >

October 1, 2012
by sjvn01
0 comments

How Watson Won at Jeopardy

While IBM’s Watson expert system isn’t ready to take over the world ala Skynet, it’s certainly “smart” enough to beat the world’s best two Jeopardy players. The company isn’t treating this as a trivial exercise; they’re also hard at work turning Watson technology into medical expert systems for cancer research and treatment, as they explained at LinuxCon 2012 in San Diego last month.

Watson, the most famous example of IBM’s DeepQA Project, is made up of ten racks of servers with 15 terabytes of RAM; 2,880 3.55GHz POWER7 processor cores; and a run speed at 80 teraflops. You’re not going to find one of these at your local electronics store.

Watson is far more than an ordinary supercomputer crunching linear equations. No, Watson is meant to solve the far harder problem of “understanding” natural language questions. DeepQA’s eventual goal, according to IBM Fellow David Ferrucci, the principal investigator for Watson technologies, is to create computers that learn through interacting with us. “They will not necessarily require us to sit down and explicitly program them, but through continuous interaction with humans they will start to understand the kind of data and the kind of computation we need,” Ferrucci says.

How Watson Won at Jeopardy. More >