Practical Technology

for practical people.

March 28, 2008
by sjvn01
0 comments

Red Hat posts great 2008 fiscal year earnings

Anyone under the delusion that you can’t make money from open source and Linux should have been on Red Hat’s 2008 fiscal year earnings call on March 27.

If they had been, they would have heard Red Hat executives report that the Linux giant posted net income of $76.7 million, or $0.36 per diluted share, for the year, compared with $59.9 million, or $.29 per diluted share, in the prior year.

According to the Raleigh, N.C., company’s financial statement, Red Hat‘s non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) “adjusted net income for the year was $152.9 million, or $0.72 per diluted share, compared to $115.9 million and $0.56 per diluted share the year before.”

The 2008 fiscal year’s non-GAAP operating cash flow totaled $71.6 million, or approximately 50 percent of revenue for the quarter and $264.3 million for the full year. At year end, the company’s total deferred revenue balance was $472.9 million, an increase of 40 percent on a year-over-year basis and 12 percent sequentially. Total cash, cash equivalents and investments as of Feb. 29, 2008 were $1.3 billion.

That number–$1.3 billion–may not be a lot to Microsoft, but by almost any other corporate standard it’s great.

During the conference call, Charlie Peters, Red Hat’s executive vice president and chief financial officer, said, “It was an outstanding year. Our annual revenue grew over 30 percent, our deferred revenue grew 40 percent, and we produced operating cash flow margins of 50 percent. The company’s performance was driven by growing demand for our open-source solutions and the convincing value which we are able to demonstrate with our customers. We are also realizing returns on the increased investment which we have made over the past year in engineering [and] sales and marketing, combined with solid execution by our associates.”

Specifically, that “increased investment” was increases in sales and marketing of 31 percent year over year while research and development costs rose 32 percent. As Peters pointed out, though the return on investment was excellent, the company still has room to grow.

Red Hat’s fourth quarter showed a company that is still growing. The financial report stated: “Total revenue for the quarter was $141.5 million, an increase of 27 percent from the year-ago quarter and 5 percent from the prior quarter. Subscription revenue for the quarter was $121.9 million, up 27 percent year-over-year and 5 percent sequentially. For the full year, total revenue was $523.0 million, an increase of 31 percent over fiscal 2007 revenue, and subscription revenue was $449.8 million, up 32 percent from the prior year.

“Net income for the quarter was $22.0 million, or $0.10 per diluted share, compared with $20.3 million, or $0.10 per diluted share, for the prior quarter and $20.5 million, or $0.10 per diluted share, in the year-ago quarter. Non-GAAP adjusted net income for the quarter was $42.7 million, or $0.20 per diluted share, after adjusting for stock compensation and tax expenses. This compares to non-GAAP adjusted net income of $39.7 million, or $0.19 per diluted share in the prior quarter.”

The company presented great results even though Red Hat faced the unexpected resignation of its longtime CEO Matthew Szulik due to family health matters in December 2007. Under new CEO Jim Whitehurst, a former Delta chief operating officer, the company has continued to do well.

Looking ahead, Whitehurst said during the earnings call that “the momentum of open-source solutions is strong and growing, and we believe there is a significant opportunity to expand our presence with existing customers and the many companies and industries that have only just begun to adopt open-source solutions in a meaningful way.” The economy, although in a decline with such failures as the collapse of Bear Stearns, may actually be good news for open-source companies.

A version of this story was first published in Linux-Watch.

March 28, 2008
by sjvn01
0 comments

We Want Our SP3!

Come on Microsoft, stop holding out on us. We want our XP SP3!

I’ve been running Windows XP3 since release candidate 1 was made available to TechNet members on December 3, 2007. And you know what? It just works.

I reviewed XP SP3 RC1, not long after it was out. I was impressed. This version of XP is faster, has improved security and, in the months since then, it has proven to be the most stable version of Windows I’ve ever had the pleasure of using on a desktop.

I have now switched my last copy of XP running on native hardware to SP3, and all my other copies, which live on in Linux desktops thanks to VirtualBox and VMware Player, are also running XP SP3. This was a no-brainer. XP SP3, even though it has not been released yet and is now up to XP SP3 RC2 Refresh (Read RC3 for all practical purposes), is just better.

So, why can’t you have it? That’s a darn good question.

Vista SP1, which is available to all now, is still more of a pain than a useful operating system. I have, as I wrote recently, finally gotten Vista to run properly on one PC after 16 months. The longest it took me to get XP SP3 to run properly was two hours.

More >

March 27, 2008
by sjvn01
0 comments

When Will We Get Our Own WiMax Links?

Wi-Fi networks freed us from having to wire our offices and homes. Now WiMAX may free us from needing any wired connection to the Internet.

If you want broadband Internet connectivity, chances are you use a DSL, or cable-modem-based landline connection at home or a T1, T3 or frame-relay at the office.

WiMAX technology promises to replace that last mile connection with a point-to-multipoint wireless connection in the same way that 802.11 Wi-Fi has replaced the wired LAN.

WiMAX, the commercial name for a variety of technologies that use the IEEE 802.16 standard, promises an open wireless standard that can deliver, in theory, up to 70M bps data throughput at ranges of up to 31 miles. As the IEEE is quick to point out though, those kinds of WiMAX ranges and speeds are myths. A more practical line of sight range might be 10M bps at 10 miles. In a city environment, realistically you’ll be glad to see 10M bps at a mile range.

However, to get away from the line of sight requirements, when vendors today, such as the recent alliance of Sprint and Clearwire, talk about WiMAX, what they’re actually thinking about deploying is Mobile WiMAX.

Mobile WiMAX is based on the IEEE 802.16e-2005 standard. This technology, in practice, should deliver 1 to 5Mbps throughput at a range of about a mile. Higher, burst rate speeds, up to its maximum of 40M bps, may also be possible.

More >

March 25, 2008
by sjvn01
0 comments

Vista Works! (After 16 Months of Trying)

If I know anything, I know operating systems. My first one was CICS/MVS on an Amdahl mainframe, followed by VAX/VMS, CP/M-80, TOPS-20, more Unix and Linux variations than you could shake a stick at, every version of DOS and Windows from 1.0 on to today. For sheer annoyance value, Vista takes the prize.

There have been far poorer operating systems. Windows ME is the Windows’ family bottom of the barrel, and let’s not even think about MS-DOS 4.01 shall we? But, nothing else except Vista promised so much, delivered so little and was such a pain in the rump about it all.

Still, after months of trying, I’m proud to say that I actually have a fully functional version of Vista SP1 running on a PC at last.

Continue Reading →

March 21, 2008
by sjvn01
0 comments

Windows is caught between Mac and Linux

For the first time in ages, the sale of new PCs with Windows as a percentage of the PC market is declining sharply. The new winner is the Mac, but, while no one does a good job of tracking the still-new, pre-installed Linux desktop market, it’s also clear that Linux is finally making impressive inroads into Windows’ once unchallenged market share.

The Mac numbers are especially revealing. NPD, a global market research company, has revealed that Apple’s share of the U.S. computer market jumped to 14 percent in February 2008. This was up from 9 percent in February 2007.

In comparison to the overall market, U.S. PC retail shipments only grew 9 percent in units shipped and a mere 5 percent in revenue in the last year. Macs, in the meantime, saw a 60 percent growth in unit sales with an even more impressive 67 percent gain in revenue growth over the same period.

Continue Reading →

March 17, 2008
by sjvn01
0 comments

Bear Stearns` Collapse Means Trouble for IT

Forget about whether we’re in a “recession” or not, the truth of the matter is the economy is in real trouble, and that means IT is as well.

Over the weekend, the IT world was transformed. Chances are you didn’t notice. No, Vista SP1 wasn’t released, neither was XP SP3, nor the beta of Ubuntu 8.04. What did happen was that on Friday, March 14, the major Wall Street bank Bear Stearns collapsed.

Bear Stearns has invested billions in two hedge funds that were built around sub-prime mortgages. Even as it became clear that holding onto sub-prime mortgages was like hanging onto an anchor, Bear Stearns decided to pour even more money into its sub-prime mortgage funds.

To put it another way, with only a pair of twos in its hand, Bear Stearns decided to go all in. They lost. Even on March 14, when it was becoming clear that Bear Stearns was in real trouble, CEO Alan Schwartz was swearing that the company would show a profit in the first quarter. Sure it was.

At the beginning of that week, Bear Stearns was selling for $70.28 a share. By Friday evening, it was selling for $30 a share. Over the weekend, with the U.S. government giving JP Morgan Chase a $30-billion guarantee it would make up any of Morgan’s losses, Morgan agreed to rescue Bear Stearns from bankruptcy for… $2 a share. For those keeping score at home, a company worth more than $8 billion Monday a week ago was just sold for $236 million.

Now, what does all that have to do with our cozy world of IT? Everything.

Everyone needs money to make money. Even Microsoft, if it’s successful in buying Yahoo, may need to borrow money. Now Microsoft can find a bank willing to loan it a billion here or there. What about your company?

More >