<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe Flash 10 on Linux: Looking Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/linux/adobe-flash-10-on-linux-looking-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/linux/adobe-flash-10-on-linux-looking-good/</link>
	<description>for practical people.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:56:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: flensed :: the Fresh! &#187; Some good news for Flash&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/linux/adobe-flash-10-on-linux-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>flensed :: the Fresh! &#187; Some good news for Flash&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=389#comment-414</guid>
		<description>[...] they may have. Keep up the good work Adobe. And Gnash, better step up your game!  Here&#8217;s a full review of Flash Player 10 beta 2 for Linux that is very [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they may have. Keep up the good work Adobe. And Gnash, better step up your game!  Here&#8217;s a full review of Flash Player 10 beta 2 for Linux that is very [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Stewart - Rich Internet Application Mountaineer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Adobe Flash Player 10 on Linux: &#8220;One Heck of a Beta&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/linux/adobe-flash-10-on-linux-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Stewart - Rich Internet Application Mountaineer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Adobe Flash Player 10 on Linux: &#8220;One Heck of a Beta&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=389#comment-400</guid>
		<description>[...] that don&#8217;t know, we&#8217;ve got a beta 2 release of Flash Player 10 which includes Linux. Practical Tech has a post up about the latest version of Flash Player 10 for Linux and is generally really happy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that don&#8217;t know, we&#8217;ve got a beta 2 release of Flash Player 10 which includes Linux. Practical Tech has a post up about the latest version of Flash Player 10 for Linux and is generally really happy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: interele</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/linux/adobe-flash-10-on-linux-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>interele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=389#comment-398</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s looking very good and it seems a lot more stable than 9. However can you get it to report it&#039;s version 9, as both CNN and the BBC say things like &#039;optimised for version 8 or higher&#039; I have emailled them to point out that 10 is generally considered to  be higher than 8 but they don&#039;t 
seem to  agree

Mal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s looking very good and it seems a lot more stable than 9. However can you get it to report it&#8217;s version 9, as both CNN and the BBC say things like &#8216;optimised for version 8 or higher&#8217; I have emailled them to point out that 10 is generally considered to  be higher than 8 but they don&#8217;t<br />
seem to  agree</p>
<p>Mal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
