<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Adobe be open-sourcing Flash?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://practical-tech.com/development/could-adobe-be-open-sourcing-flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practical-tech.com/development/could-adobe-be-open-sourcing-flash/1699/</link>
	<description>for practical people.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:51:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmarti</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/development/could-adobe-be-open-sourcing-flash/1699/comment-page-1/#comment-916</link>
		<dc:creator>dmarti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=1699#comment-916</guid>
		<description>Problem is that if they actually open-source it, the Windows spyware/adware/malware scene is going to go nuts with fake &quot;upgrade Flash&quot; sites.  Safest and best is that YouTube and the major Flash game sites also test with the alternate implementations, just as webmasters test on Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problem is that if they actually open-source it, the Windows spyware/adware/malware scene is going to go nuts with fake &#8220;upgrade Flash&#8221; sites.  Safest and best is that YouTube and the major Flash game sites also test with the alternate implementations, just as webmasters test on Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

