<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Practical Technology &#187; Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://practical-tech.com/category/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practical-tech.com</link>
	<description>for practical people.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:47:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Court slaps down the use of IP addresses in file-sharing cases</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/entertainment/court-slaps-down-the-use-of-ip-addresses-in-file-sharing-cases/5184/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/entertainment/court-slaps-down-the-use-of-ip-addresses-in-file-sharing-cases/5184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 17:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer to Peer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=5184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The MPAA, RIAA and other copyright holding companies have long used Internet Protocol (IP) addresses to identify users for their lawsuits. They’ll find that people at various IP addresses have used BitTorrent or some other peer-to-peer (P2P) service seem to have downloaded copyrighted video or music and then sic their lawyer attack dogs on them. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/entertainment/court-slaps-down-the-use-of-ip-addresses-in-file-sharing-cases/5184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google may be able to legally listen in to your Wi-Fi networking</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/network/google-may-be-able-to-legally-listen-in-to-your-wi-fi-networking/5131/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/network/google-may-be-able-to-legally-listen-in-to-your-wi-fi-networking/5131/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wi-Fi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=5131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) proposed a $25,000 fine against Google for “deliberately impeded and delayed” an ongoing investigation into whether it breached federal laws over its street-mapping service that peeked in on open, unencrypted, Wi-Fi access points (AP). Read that again, Google wasn’t fined for collecting and storing data from unencrypted wireless [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/network/google-may-be-able-to-legally-listen-in-to-your-wi-fi-networking/5131/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Securing Your Printer with IEEE P2600</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/securing-your-printer-with-ieee-p2600/5054/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/securing-your-printer-with-ieee-p2600/5054/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=5054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once upon a time, we didn&#8217;t even think about securing the information on our printers. Oh, certainly we didn&#8217;t want someone on the help desk printing out a Dilbert cartoon on the executive suite&#8217;s prize color laser printer, but making sure no one could read a recently printed document from the printer&#8217;s own queue? Why [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/securing-your-printer-with-ieee-p2600/5054/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

