<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Practical Technology &#187; Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://practical-tech.com/category/operating-system/windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practical-tech.com</link>
	<description>for practical people.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:34:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Too big to fail? Microsoft, ARM, and Windows 8.</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/too-big-to-fail-microsoft-arm-and-windows-8/4823/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/too-big-to-fail-microsoft-arm-and-windows-8/4823/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SmartPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=4823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 1912, three of the ten biggest companies in the world were J&#38;P Coats, Pullman, and U.S. Steel. They were giants in their day. Today, they’re either business history footnotes or shadows of their former selves. Why in the world should we think Microsoft will be any different? I wrote recently about Microsoft trying to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/too-big-to-fail-microsoft-arm-and-windows-8/4823/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft to lock out other operating systems from Windows 8 ARM PCs &amp; devices</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/microsoft-to-lock-out-other-operating-systems-from-windows-8-arm-pcs-devices/4817/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/microsoft-to-lock-out-other-operating-systems-from-windows-8-arm-pcs-devices/4817/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=4817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft and its vendor friends said that there’s no Windows 8 plot to lock other operating systems from Windows 8 devices, but now we know Microsoft was lying. Journalist Glyn Moody dug around Microsoft’s Windows Hardware Certification Requirements for Windows 8 client and server systems and found on page 116 that will Windows 8 Secure [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/microsoft-to-lock-out-other-operating-systems-from-windows-8-arm-pcs-devices/4817/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft is finally making good products &#8212; but it&#8217;s too late</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/microsoft-is-finally-making-good-products-but-its-too-late/4800/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/microsoft-is-finally-making-good-products-but-its-too-late/4800/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SmartPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=4800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you&#8217;ve read many of my articles over the past 20 years, you may have noticed that I don&#8217;t care for Microsoft or its products. That isn&#8217;t because I think open-source software or Apple products are unbeatably great. It&#8217;s because Microsoft&#8217;s products are usually awful. A lot of you are thinking I can&#8217;t possibly be right [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/microsoft-is-finally-making-good-products-but-its-too-late/4800/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

