<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Practical Technology &#187; Embedded</title>
	<atom:link href="http://practical-tech.com/category/development/embedded/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practical-tech.com</link>
	<description>for practical people.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:47:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google to centralize Android development and sales</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/google-to-centralize-android-development-and-sales/5241/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/google-to-centralize-android-development-and-sales/5241/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Embedded]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SmartPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=5241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For all its popularity, Android programming, sales, and marketing has been… chaotic. Every hardware vendor makes its own Android mix, which more often than not is based on an older version, and each company sales and markets their smartphones and tablets independently of each other. That may be changing now. According to a Wall Street [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/google-to-centralize-android-development-and-sales/5241/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The muddled mess of the Oracle vs. Google trial</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/the-muddled-mess-of-the-oracle-vs-google-trial/5204/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/the-muddled-mess-of-the-oracle-vs-google-trial/5204/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 22:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Embedded]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SmartPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=5204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the surface, it may look like Oracle won the first round of its intellectual property (IP) lawsuit with Google. Look again. No one’s won anything and that includes Oracle. While we wait to see what the jury has to say about the two remaining patents, let’s take a closer look at what the jury [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/the-muddled-mess-of-the-oracle-vs-google-trial/5204/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle&#8217;s Google Android patent lawsuit cut down to size</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/oracles-google-android-patent-lawsuit-cut-down-to-size/5050/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/oracles-google-android-patent-lawsuit-cut-down-to-size/5050/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Embedded]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SmartPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=5050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Instead of extracting billions from Google for violating its Java software patents in Android, Oracle will be lucky to get over a $100-million from its intellectual property (IP) lawsuit. That’s chump change by mega-company standards. Taking into consideration the legal costs, Oracle could have made more money if it had just offered Google an open-ended [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/oracles-google-android-patent-lawsuit-cut-down-to-size/5050/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

