<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Practical Technology &#187; VMware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://practical-tech.com/category/business/vmware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practical-tech.com</link>
	<description>for practical people.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:47:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Does VMware have a real future?</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/does-vmware-have-a-real-future/5065/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/does-vmware-have-a-real-future/5065/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=5065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know that technologies come and go. Sometimes, technology companies do the same thing. I&#8217;ve long thought that VMware&#8217;s days were numbered, and not because there&#8217;s anything wrong with its technology. VMware has dominated the virtualization market ever since that market came into being. It has done so the old-fashioned way: by offering good [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/does-vmware-have-a-real-future/5065/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red Hat&#8217;s biggest enemy? VMware</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/red-hats-biggest-enemy-vmware/4416/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/red-hats-biggest-enemy-vmware/4416/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LAMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=4416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let’s play a game. Who do you think Red Hat’s biggest enemy will be in a few years? Will it be Microsoft, Linux’s traditional enemy? Could SUSE, the number two business Linux distributor, make a try for the top? Might Ubuntu’s Canonical make its big break into corporate Linux? All good guesses, but Red Hat [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/red-hats-biggest-enemy-vmware/4416/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who really bought Novell? Microsoft.</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/who-really-bought-novell-microsoft/3278/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/who-really-bought-novell-microsoft/3278/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attachmate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=3278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who really bought Novell? Of course, I know that Attachmate is the company that&#8217;s on record as purchasing Novell for $2.2-billion, while Microsoft shelled out $450 million for some Novell intellectual property. But tell me, where did Attachmate get $2.2-billion? Could it have been Microsoft? I think so. I&#8217;ve covered Attachmate over the years, so [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/who-really-bought-novell-microsoft/3278/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

