<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Practical Technology &#187; Reseller</title>
	<atom:link href="http://practical-tech.com/category/business/reseller/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practical-tech.com</link>
	<description>for practical people.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:34:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ubuntu Linux gets serious about business partners</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/ubuntu-linux-gets-serious-about-business-partners/4303/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/ubuntu-linux-gets-serious-about-business-partners/4303/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canonical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reseller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=4303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most people, who like Linux, love Ubuntu. Oh they may object to Ubuntu’s new Unity desktop, but at day’s end, they still use Ubuntu. Technology businesses though have a more jaundiced view of Canonical, Ubuntu’s parent company. Canonical, though, is now taking steps now to make its potential hardware and software partners happier. First, Canonical [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/ubuntu-linux-gets-serious-about-business-partners/4303/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now what Novell?</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/now-what-novell/2593/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/now-what-novell/2593/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reseller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=2593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s nothing like starting a technical conference, like Novell&#8217;s BrainShare, off with a bang. Or, in this case telling Elliot Associates&#8217; unwelcome offer of not quite $2-billion for the company that Novell has no interest in selling out, not for that little anyway. I think this was a smart move by Novell&#8217;s management. I think [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/now-what-novell/2593/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When SCO is dead and buried</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/linux/when-sco-is-dead-and-buried/1789/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/linux/when-sco-is-dead-and-buried/1789/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 22:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reseller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=1789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a time when SCO was a great company. No. Seriously. SCO Unix was a great Unix for x86 systems, and, for a brief shining moment it looked like SCO would bring together the best things of both Unix and Linux. Then, SCO&#8217;s ownership got it into their heads that trying to take IBM, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/linux/when-sco-is-dead-and-buried/1789/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

