<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Practical Technology &#187; Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://practical-tech.com/category/business/management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practical-tech.com</link>
	<description>for practical people.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:47:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s what with Barnes &amp; Noble and Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/whats-what-with-barnes-noble-and-microsoft/5173/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/whats-what-with-barnes-noble-and-microsoft/5173/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 15:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barnes & Noble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=5173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, Microsoft sued Barnes &#38; Noble for breaking patents in its Android-based e-readers. Most companies, like Samsung, when sued by Microsoft over similar claims folded and paid off Microsoft. That’s why Microsoft makes more money from Android than it does from its own mobile operating system offerings. But, Barnes &#38; Noble didn’t roll over. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/whats-what-with-barnes-noble-and-microsoft/5173/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook + Instagram = one big acquisition flop</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/network/facebook-instagram-one-big-acquisition-flop/5144/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/network/facebook-instagram-one-big-acquisition-flop/5144/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=5144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know, I know. Facebook&#8217;s acquisition of Instagram hasn&#8217;t even been finalized yet and I&#8217;m already calling it a complete waste of a billion dollars. How can I say that? Easy. Let&#8217;s look at the facts, shall we? Facebook paid about $28 for each of Instagram&#8217;s 35 million users. As such things go, that doesn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/network/facebook-instagram-one-big-acquisition-flop/5144/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linux patent defense group expands open-source protection</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/linux-patent-defense-group-expands-open-source-protection/4979/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/linux-patent-defense-group-expands-open-source-protection/4979/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=4979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Open Invention Network (OIN) has significantly expanded and updated the Linux System technologies covered by its protective network of royalty-free cross-licenses. Over 700 new software packages–including popular packages such as Kernel Virtual Machine (KVM), Git, OpenJDK, and WebKit–will now receive coverage. In addition, coverage for over 1,000 existing software packages has been updated. Soon, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/linux-patent-defense-group-expands-open-source-protection/4979/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

