<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Practical Technology &#187; Legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://practical-tech.com/category/business/legal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practical-tech.com</link>
	<description>for practical people.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:47:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Copyrights, APIs, and Oracle vs Google</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/copyrights-apis-and-oracle-vs-google/5210/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/copyrights-apis-and-oracle-vs-google/5210/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 21:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SmartPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=5210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We still don’t know what will happen with Oracle’s accusations that Google violated its patents. Given that Oracle itself doesn’t value the two remaining patents as being worth much, that decision won’t matter much. No, the real question is what will U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup will do with notion that Java’s application programming [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/copyrights-apis-and-oracle-vs-google/5210/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The muddled mess of the Oracle vs. Google trial</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/the-muddled-mess-of-the-oracle-vs-google-trial/5204/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/the-muddled-mess-of-the-oracle-vs-google-trial/5204/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 22:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Embedded]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SmartPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=5204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the surface, it may look like Oracle won the first round of its intellectual property (IP) lawsuit with Google. Look again. No one’s won anything and that includes Oracle. While we wait to see what the jury has to say about the two remaining patents, let’s take a closer look at what the jury [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/the-muddled-mess-of-the-oracle-vs-google-trial/5204/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court slaps down the use of IP addresses in file-sharing cases</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/entertainment/court-slaps-down-the-use-of-ip-addresses-in-file-sharing-cases/5184/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/entertainment/court-slaps-down-the-use-of-ip-addresses-in-file-sharing-cases/5184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 17:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer to Peer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=5184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The MPAA, RIAA and other copyright holding companies have long used Internet Protocol (IP) addresses to identify users for their lawsuits. They’ll find that people at various IP addresses have used BitTorrent or some other peer-to-peer (P2P) service seem to have downloaded copyrighted video or music and then sic their lawyer attack dogs on them. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/entertainment/court-slaps-down-the-use-of-ip-addresses-in-file-sharing-cases/5184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

