<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Practical Technology &#187; Legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://practical-tech.com/category/business/legal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practical-tech.com</link>
	<description>for practical people.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:31:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Even as SCO dies, the company lies</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/even-as-sco-dies-the-company-lies/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/even-as-sco-dies-the-company-lies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=2898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This would be funny if only there weren&#8217;t people out there who are fool enough to believe in any anti-Linus lie. I mean, how dead does SCO have to be before its anti-Linux FUD finally disappears into the history books? It&#8217;s not dead enough yet it seems. In the latest revival of SCO&#8217;s long disproved [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/operating-system/even-as-sco-dies-the-company-lies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bilski loses, but the patent madness continues</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/business/bilski-loses-but-the-patent-madness-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/business/bilski-loses-but-the-patent-madness-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=2867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once upon a time, the U.S. patent system served a useful purpose. It was meant to encourage inventors and innovation. Ha! Boy, was that a long time ago. Now patents, especially software patents, serve only as bludgeons for patent trolls &#8212; companies that do nothing but own patents and then threaten to sue companies that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/business/bilski-loses-but-the-patent-madness-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarbanes-Oxley on the ropes or business as usual?</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/business/sarbanes-oxley-on-the-ropes-or-business-as-usual/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/business/sarbanes-oxley-on-the-ropes-or-business-as-usual/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=2864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Put away the party hats. Put the champagne glasses down, when SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) rules that part of Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX), a set of federal laws that spell out the financial disclosure and fiscal responsibilities of a company&#8217;s executives was unconstitutional, many people thought SOX was dead, dead, dead! Ahem. No such [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/business/sarbanes-oxley-on-the-ropes-or-business-as-usual/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
