<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Practical Technology &#187; Intel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://practical-tech.com/category/business/intel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practical-tech.com</link>
	<description>for practical people.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:34:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google and Intel Android pairing spells trouble for Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/google-and-intel-android-pairing-spells-trouble-for-microsoft/4480/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/google-and-intel-android-pairing-spells-trouble-for-microsoft/4480/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 23:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SmartPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=4480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While all the attention was on Windows 8’s preview this week I wonder whether the real end-user operating news wasn’t happening elsewhere. To be exact, I think Google and Intel’s announcement that Android was coming to the Intel chip family will end up being the bigger news. My fellow ZDNet writer James Kendrick touches on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/google-and-intel-android-pairing-spells-trouble-for-microsoft/4480/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Android, MeeGo &amp; WebOS need to get going on tablets: Now</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/android-meego-webos-need-to-get-going-on-tablets-now/3748/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/android-meego-webos-need-to-get-going-on-tablets-now/3748/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Embedded]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=3748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a confession to make. I use Linux more than I do any other operating system by a wide margin, but I also use a lot of Apple products. In house at the moment are two Mac Minis; a MacBook Pro, a pair of iPod Touches, and, oh yes, an iPad mark 1. I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/android-meego-webos-need-to-get-going-on-tablets-now/3748/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Nokia&#8217;s Windows move means for Open Source</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/what-nokias-windows-move-means-for-open-source/3664/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/what-nokias-windows-move-means-for-open-source/3664/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Embedded]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SmartPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=3664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Nokia announced that it was going to use Microsoft’s Windows Phone 7 for its smartphones some people saw this is a great move. Other folks, like yours truly, saw Nokia and Microsoft partnering being as dumb as betting that the Pittsburgh Pirates will win the 2011 World Series. But, what do Nokia’s open-source partners [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/what-nokias-windows-move-means-for-open-source/3664/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

