<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Practical Technology &#187; Intel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://practical-tech.com/category/business/intel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practical-tech.com</link>
	<description>for practical people.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:47:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Intel distributes LibreOffice, can Microsoft be pleased?</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/intel-distributes-libreoffice-can-microsoft-be-pleased/4951/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/intel-distributes-libreoffice-can-microsoft-be-pleased/4951/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=4951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LibreOffice, the OpenOffice fork, is a very popular open-source office suite. But, while it has great support from Linux distributors, like openSUSE and Ubuntu, LibreOffice has never had a major corporate backer on the Windows side… until now. Intel is now offering LibreOffice to Windows users via its AppUp application store. I wonder how Microsoft [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/intel-distributes-libreoffice-can-microsoft-be-pleased/4951/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google and Intel Android pairing spells trouble for Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/google-and-intel-android-pairing-spells-trouble-for-microsoft/4480/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/google-and-intel-android-pairing-spells-trouble-for-microsoft/4480/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 23:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SmartPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=4480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While all the attention was on Windows 8’s preview this week I wonder whether the real end-user operating news wasn’t happening elsewhere. To be exact, I think Google and Intel’s announcement that Android was coming to the Intel chip family will end up being the bigger news. My fellow ZDNet writer James Kendrick touches on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/google-and-intel-android-pairing-spells-trouble-for-microsoft/4480/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Android, MeeGo &amp; WebOS need to get going on tablets: Now</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/android-meego-webos-need-to-get-going-on-tablets-now/3748/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/android-meego-webos-need-to-get-going-on-tablets-now/3748/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Embedded]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=3748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a confession to make. I use Linux more than I do any other operating system by a wide margin, but I also use a lot of Apple products. In house at the moment are two Mac Minis; a MacBook Pro, a pair of iPod Touches, and, oh yes, an iPad mark 1. I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/android-meego-webos-need-to-get-going-on-tablets-now/3748/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

