<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Practical Technology &#187; Adobe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://practical-tech.com/category/business/adobe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practical-tech.com</link>
	<description>for practical people.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:34:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Flash is dead. Long live HTML5.</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/network/flash-is-dead-long-live-html5/4660/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/network/flash-is-dead-long-live-html5/4660/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=4660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adobe’s love affair with its Flash format has come to an end. Oh sure, Adobe said they were just killing development on mobile browser Flash in favor of HTML5, but seriously, do you think, that they’ll keep working on Flash on the desktop for much longer? If you do, I have a nice, lightly-used bridge [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/network/flash-is-dead-long-live-html5/4660/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google removing H.264 from Chrome does nothing to HMTL5</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/entertainment/google-removing-h-264-from-chrome-does-nothing-to-hmtl5/3506/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/entertainment/google-removing-h-264-from-chrome-does-nothing-to-hmtl5/3506/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 19:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=3506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In some technology circles, you’d think Google was proposing throwing cats into a wood-chipper from the way some people are reacting to Google’s announcement that it was focusing its support on its own open VP8/WebM and Theora video codecs, and dropping support for H.264. This is not a step back for openness; any kind of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/entertainment/google-removing-h-264-from-chrome-does-nothing-to-hmtl5/3506/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone vs. Android: Five points of difference</title>
		<link>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/iphone-vs-android-five-points-of-difference/2869/</link>
		<comments>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/iphone-vs-android-five-points-of-difference/2869/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjvn01</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SmartPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practical-tech.com/?p=2869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, the way people are arguing about iPhones vs. Android phones I&#8217;m having flash-backs to the grand old tech. flame wars of Macs vs. PCs; OS/2 vs. Windows; or vi vs. EMACS. Now, I don&#8217;t have a dog in this fight. I&#8217;ve used both iPhones and Android phones, specifically the HTC EVO and Motorola Droid, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://practical-tech.com/infrastructure/iphone-vs-android-five-points-of-difference/2869/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

